How much is a Kirkland’s Warbler worth?
What is the monetary value of a California Condor?
Once of the significant changes that is being made by the current presidential administration to the US Endangered Species Act (ESA) is to take the economic considerations of a project or a impacted species into account. This will mean that if a particular project could generate a lot of money, it might be able to move ahead even if it destroyed an endangered species. Also, if measures to save a particular species are expensive, they may be ignored in favor of a profitable project.
This is a terrible change.
Protecting a species should be undertaken simply for its own right. If that is expensive, so be it. If it is difficult, so be it. If it is unprofitable, so be it!
Economic considerations have no place in deciding which species to save and whether or not some species to go extinct. Period.
If economic considerations do become part of the endangered species conservation decision making process, we will all have to answer the two questions that I began this post with. Many industries will be working hard to put dollar amounts on species, and to make sure those values are as low as possible.
Here is a short video from Beau and the Fifth Column, a youtube content creator I like, on the subject.
Let’s talk about the Endangered Species Act, Chickens, and Painters….
And here is a link to written testimony by Dr. Jane Goodall to the U.S. House of Representatives on the value and importance of the Endangered Species Act.
Dr. Jane Goodall to the U.S. House of Representatives
One result of adding economic considerations into conservation decisions will be more extent species. And this during an ongoing extinction crisis.
Leave a Reply